Every value creation plan is built around growth: add-on acquisitions, new markets, pricing power, cross-sell across the platform. Every one of those plans assumes the sales organization inherited at close can actually deliver the number. Most cannot. Not because the people are bad, but because nobody ever audited how they sell, structured how they are paid, or coached how they close.
Portfolio company revenue leaks out through four familiar gaps:
- Founder-led sales never transfers — when the founder or a handful of legacy reps carry the pipeline, growth stalls the moment ownership changes, and add-on integrations stall because there is no repeatable process to onboard acquired sales teams into.
- Comp plans reward order-taking, not growth — legacy commission structures pay reps for renewals and inbound, not for the new-logo and cross-sell growth the investment thesis actually requires.
- No forecast anyone trusts — without a consistent qualifying process, pipeline reviews are guesswork, and quarterly board decks get built on hope instead of data.
- Territories and org charts built for the old company — reps cover accounts and geographies drawn up years before the platform started acquiring, so add-ons overlap, whitespace goes uncovered, and nobody owns the gap.
Do the math. For a $25M-revenue portfolio company, a five-point improvement in close rate paired with a ten percent lift in average deal size is worth roughly $2 to $3 million in incremental annual revenue — math most portfolio companies leave on the table because nobody owns the sales system.
Revenue growth is systems, not willpower. Attitude, Behavior, and Technique have to be redesigned together, not one at a time. Most portfolio company sales issues get treated as a hiring problem or a motivation problem, when they are a systems problem: no consistent process, no reinforced belief that the process works, no shared language for qualifying and closing. A performance growth analysis diagnoses all three before a single dollar gets spent on new tools or new hires.
The same deal thesis produces two very different outcomes depending on the approach.
- The typical post-close approach hires a new VP of Sales and hopes, rolls out a new CRM with no process to run through it, sets an aggressive quota with no coaching behind it, redesigns the comp plan in isolation by finance, and draws the org chart from the cap table instead of account coverage.
- The Sandler-supported approach runs an independent performance growth analysis before any org change, configures the CRM around a proven qualifying process, pairs quota with a weekly coaching and accountability cadence, redesigns comp plan, territories, and org chart together, and assesses and trains leadership on the same system the reps use.
Before recommending a single change, run a structured audit of the sales organization, pipeline data, win and loss patterns, and rep-by-rep performance against the investment thesis. Ask for a rep-by-rep breakdown of average deal size, close rate, and sales cycle length for the trailing twelve months. If nobody can produce it within a day, that is the first finding.
Then assess each seller and sales leader against DISC behavioral style and a skill and will matrix. Not every underperforming rep is a termination decision. Some are a coaching gap, some are a territory mismatch, some are the wrong seat entirely, and guessing wrong is expensive during a hold period with a tight timeline to exit.
Rebuild the sales org chart around account coverage and the growth thesis, not the legacy title structure inherited at close. Rebuild the CRM around a consistent qualifying process, redesign comp plans to reward the growth behaviors the thesis requires, and reassign territories to match the platform's current footprint. A comp plan that pays for renewals when you need new logos will get you renewals. Systems only produce the behavior they are built to reward.
Train the sales team and sales leadership on a common language for qualifying, presenting, and closing, built around the Pain Funnel and up-front contracts, so every deal in the CRM gets qualified the same way. Then install a weekly coaching and accountability cadence so the new behaviors survive past the ninety-day mark. Training without reinforcement decays within weeks.
Every quarter without a functioning sales system is a quarter of hold-period runway spent without compounding growth, and a harder story to tell at exit.
Want the full Growth Plan Chris wrote to help operating partners and portfolio teams like yours? Email him here with the subject line "I want the Private Equity Firms Growth Plan."
